| Title | After The Enlightenment: The Rediscovery Of Averroes By Tiedemann And Herder |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 113 - 139 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Kant |
| Author(s) | Stefan Schick |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Both Arabic modernists and Western humanists often regard the Muslim philosopher Averroes as one of the earliest precursors of Kant and the European Enlightenment. In contrast to this reputation, this paper argues that it was Kant’s critics Herder and Tiedemann who rediscovered Averroes. Tiedemann was the first German historiographer to give an accurate account of Averroes’ thought. This was accompanied by a re-evaluation of Averroes by Herder in his Letters for the Advancement of Humanity, in which he recognized the similarity between his own concept of the spirit of the age as historical reason – his alternative to the Enlightenment concept of a universal and ahistorical reason – and Averroes’ concept of a single material intellect for all individual human minds. Finally, the paper outlines the possible connections between Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s intellect and Hegel’s concept of reason in history. Les modernistes arabes et les humanistes occidentaux considèrent souvent le philosophe musulman Averroès comme l’un des premiers précurseurs de Kant et des Lumières européennes. Contrairement à cette réputation, cet article soutient que ce sont les critiqueurs de Kant, Herder et Tiedemann, qui ont redécouvert Averroès. Tiedemann a été le premier historiographe allemand à donner un compte rendu précis de la pensée d’Averroès. Cela s’est accompagné d’une réévaluation d’Averroès par Herder dans ses Lettres sur les progrès de l’humanité, dans lesquelles il reconnaît la similitude entre son propre concept de l’esprit du temps en tant que raison historique – son alternative au concept des Lumières d’une raison universelle et anhistorique – et le concept d’Averroès d’un intellect matériel unique pour tous les esprits humains individuels. Enfin, l’article expose les liens possibles entre l’interprétation d’Averroès de l’intellect d’Aristote et le concept de raison historique de Hegel. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5602","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5602,"authors_free":[{"id":6503,"entry_id":5602,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1740,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stefan Schick","free_first_name":"Stefan ","free_last_name":"Schick","norm_person":{"id":1740,"first_name":"Stefan","last_name":"Schick","full_name":"Stefan Schick","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1021039934","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stefan Schick"}}],"entry_title":"After The Enlightenment: The Rediscovery Of Averroes By Tiedemann And Herder","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"After The Enlightenment: The Rediscovery Of Averroes By Tiedemann And Herder"},"abstract":"Both Arabic modernists and Western humanists often regard the Muslim philosopher Averroes as one of the earliest precursors of Kant and the European Enlightenment. In contrast to this reputation, this paper argues that it was Kant\u2019s critics Herder and Tiedemann who rediscovered Averroes. Tiedemann was the first German historiographer to give an accurate account of Averroes\u2019 thought. This was accompanied by a re-evaluation of Averroes by Herder in his Letters for the Advancement of Humanity, in which he recognized the similarity between his own concept of the spirit of the age as historical reason \u2013 his alternative to the Enlightenment concept of a universal and ahistorical reason \u2013 and Averroes\u2019 concept of a single material intellect for all individual human minds. Finally, the paper outlines the possible connections between Averroes\u2019 interpretation of Aristotle\u2019s intellect and Hegel\u2019s concept of reason in history.\r\n\r\nLes modernistes arabes et les humanistes occidentaux consid\u00e8rent souvent le philosophe musulman Averro\u00e8s comme l\u2019un des premiers pr\u00e9curseurs de Kant et des Lumi\u00e8res europ\u00e9ennes. Contrairement \u00e0 cette r\u00e9putation, cet article soutient que ce sont les critiqueurs de Kant, Herder et Tiedemann, qui ont red\u00e9couvert Averro\u00e8s. Tiedemann a \u00e9t\u00e9 le premier historiographe allemand \u00e0 donner un compte rendu pr\u00e9cis de la pens\u00e9e d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. Cela s\u2019est accompagn\u00e9 d\u2019une r\u00e9\u00e9valuation d\u2019Averro\u00e8s par Herder dans ses Lettres sur les progr\u00e8s de l\u2019humanit\u00e9, dans lesquelles il reconna\u00eet la similitude entre son propre concept de l\u2019esprit du temps en tant que raison historique \u2013 son alternative au concept des Lumi\u00e8res d\u2019une raison universelle et anhistorique \u2013 et le concept d\u2019Averro\u00e8s d\u2019un intellect mat\u00e9riel unique pour tous les esprits humains individuels. Enfin, l\u2019article expose les liens possibles entre l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation d\u2019Averro\u00e8s de l\u2019intellect d\u2019Aristote et le concept de raison historique de Hegel.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095742392200011X","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":61,"category_name":"Kant","link":"bib?categories[]=Kant"}],"authors":[{"id":1740,"full_name":"Stefan Schick","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5602,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"33","issue":"1 ","pages":"113 - 139"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | La tradition hébraïque du Tahâfut al-Tahâfut d'Averroès. Status quaestionis et perspectives de recherche |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2023 |
| Categories | Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Donato |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03931114 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5603","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5603,"authors_free":[{"id":6504,"entry_id":5603,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1025,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Donato","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":" Di Donato","norm_person":{"id":1025,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Di Donato","full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034945653","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/171527049","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Di Donato"}}],"entry_title":"La tradition h\u00e9bra\u00efque du Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut d'Averro\u00e8s. Status quaestionis et perspectives de recherche","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La tradition h\u00e9bra\u00efque du Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut d'Averro\u00e8s. Status quaestionis et perspectives de recherche"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/hal.archives-ouvertes.fr\/hal-03931114","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1025,"full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Mediæval Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides’ Response to the Question of Eternity |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | The Maghreb Review |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 289-307 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Maimonides, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | S. M. Hadi Gerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The study aims to show how taking history and perspective into consideration could help in understanding mediæval philosophy. To that end, in spite of a philosophical assumption which usually considers that there is no connection between eternity and creation, the paper assumes that Maimonides planned to establish a distinct response which was neither creation nor eternity. Investigating Maimonides’ perspective will be approached in two ways. Firstly, through the distinction between Maimonides, on one hand and theologians and philosophers on the other will be discussed from an intellectual point of view. Al-Ghazālī will be compared to Maimonides to show that, despite initial impressions, they differ substantially from each other on this issue. It will also be shown how Maimonides differentiated his discourse from that of the Greek philosophers. It will firstly be shown here that Maimonides’ response to the question of eternity adopts a different position from that of the classical theologians and the ancient philosophers. Secondly, the historicity of Maimonides’ discourse, or whether anyone else shared Maimonides’ conciliatory approach, will be examined. It will be shown that Averroes has the highest affinity with Maimonides in this regard. This will result in recognition of the fact that Maimonides’ “conciliatory approach” was shared with some other mediæval philosophers such as Averroes. Ultimately, it will be explained how Maimonides’ complicated concept of eternity can be better understood and justified if one takes perspective and historical discourse into consideration, showing that he was someone who tried to incorporate “conciliatory discourse” into mediæval philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5604","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5604,"authors_free":[{"id":6505,"entry_id":5604,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"S. M. Hadi Gerami","free_first_name":"S. M. Hadi ","free_last_name":" Gerami","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Medi\u00e6val Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides\u2019 Response to the Question of Eternity","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Medi\u00e6val Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides\u2019 Response to the Question of Eternity"},"abstract":"The study aims to show how taking history and perspective into consideration could help in understanding medi\u00e6val philosophy. To that end, in spite of a philosophical assumption which usually considers that there is no connection between eternity and creation, the paper assumes that Maimonides planned to establish a distinct response which was neither creation nor eternity. Investigating Maimonides\u2019 perspective will be approached in two ways. Firstly, through the distinction between Maimonides, on one hand and theologians and philosophers on the other will be discussed from an intellectual point of view. Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b will be compared to Maimonides to show that, despite initial impressions, they differ substantially from each other on this issue. It will also be shown how Maimonides differentiated his discourse from that of the Greek philosophers. It will firstly be shown here that Maimonides\u2019 response to the question of eternity adopts a different position from that of the classical theologians and the ancient philosophers. Secondly, the historicity of Maimonides\u2019 discourse, or whether anyone else shared Maimonides\u2019 conciliatory approach, will be examined. It will be shown that Averroes has the highest affinity with Maimonides in this regard. This will result in recognition of the fact that Maimonides\u2019 \u201cconciliatory approach\u201d was shared with some other medi\u00e6val philosophers such as Averroes. Ultimately, it will be explained how Maimonides\u2019 complicated concept of eternity can be better understood and justified if one takes perspective and historical discourse into consideration, showing that he was someone who tried to incorporate \u201cconciliatory discourse\u201d into medi\u00e6val philosophy.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1353\/tmr.2015.0029","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5604,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Maghreb Review","volume":"40","issue":"3","pages":"289-307"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Può un uomo generarsi nell’utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Noctua |
| Volume | X |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 46-105 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Natural Philosophy, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Mario Loconsole |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals – namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction – is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna’s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes’ perspective. To this ‘Averroist front’ undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum – a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes’ Physica – composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work – but which was disputed according to its author also in public – as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5600","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5600,"authors_free":[{"id":6501,"entry_id":5600,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Loconsole","free_first_name":"Mario ","free_last_name":"Loconsole","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals \u2013 namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction \u2013 is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna\u2019s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes\u2019 perspective. To this \u2018Averroist front\u2019 undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum \u2013 a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes\u2019 Physica \u2013 composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work \u2013 but which was disputed according to its author also in public \u2013 as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle\u2019s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14640\/NoctuaX2","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5600,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noctua","volume":"X","issue":"1","pages":"46-105"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | The revision of the origins science of fiqh model: Ibn Rushd’s book Aldarory |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | ournal of Umm Al-Qura University for Sharia'h Sciences and Islamic Studies |
| Issue | 93 |
| Pages | 133-159 |
| Categories | Law |
| Author(s) | Mohammed Ibrahim Alkaltham |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This research project wants to discuss two subjects. The first will be an initiation about the topics that Ibn Rushd could purify from the science of jurisprudence. In the second, we will study the suitability of revising the science of jurisprudence based on the issues referred by Ibn Rushd. This research was conducted using the method of induction and analysis, and it was prefaced with a statement of what is meant by revising the principles of jurisprudence and the efforts of the fundamentalists in it, with a translation for Ibn Rushd. The research has been divided into two sections. In the first, we explained Ibn Rushd's approach to the revision of the principles of jurisprudence. In the second topic, we make an extrapolation of the places in which Ibn Rushd revised the principles and studied them by editing Ibn Rushd's opinion first and then inducing the opinions of the fundamentalists with the report including reasoning for each opinion. The positions that were induced were organized into five topics according to their types, namely: verbal issues, logical issues, linguistic issues, jurisprudential branches, and issues that do not bear benefit. Then, I make a conclusion in which the results and recommendations were presented. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5765","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5765,"authors_free":[{"id":6677,"entry_id":5765,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mohammed Ibrahim Alkaltham","free_first_name":"Mohammed Ibrahim ","free_last_name":" Alkaltham","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The revision of the origins science of fiqh model: Ibn Rushd\u2019s book Aldarory","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The revision of the origins science of fiqh model: Ibn Rushd\u2019s book Aldarory"},"abstract":"This research project wants to discuss two subjects. The first will be an initiation about the topics that Ibn Rushd could purify from the science of jurisprudence. In the second, we will study the suitability of revising the science of jurisprudence based on the issues referred by Ibn Rushd. This research was conducted using the method of induction and analysis, and it was prefaced with a statement of what is meant by revising the principles of jurisprudence and the efforts of the fundamentalists in it, with a translation for Ibn Rushd.\r\n\r\nThe research has been divided into two sections. In the first, we explained Ibn Rushd's approach to the revision of the principles of jurisprudence. In the second topic, we make an extrapolation of the places in which Ibn Rushd revised the principles and studied them by editing Ibn Rushd's opinion first and then inducing the opinions of the fundamentalists with the report including reasoning for each opinion. The positions that were induced were organized into five topics according to their types, namely: verbal issues, logical issues, linguistic issues, jurisprudential branches, and issues that do not bear benefit. Then, I make a conclusion in which the results and recommendations were presented.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54940\/si20429509","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5765,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"ournal of Umm Al-Qura University for Sharia'h Sciences and Islamic Studies","volume":"","issue":"93","pages":"133-159"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the mutakallimūn |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | British journal for the history of philosophy |
| Volume | ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Categories | Psychology |
| Author(s) | Deborah L. Black |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In classical Arabic philosophy, the topic of consciousness is commonly associated with Avicenna's ‘Flying Man’ thought experiment. But Avicenna's explorations of the nature of consciousness are not confined to the Flying Man, and he is by no means the only classical Islamic thinker to deem consciousness an important feature of our experience. Consciousness also plays a important role in the epistemology and moral psychology of Avicenna's intellectual rivals, the theologians (mutakallumūn), who represent important sources for Avicenna's own theorizing about consciousness. And while Avicenna's philosophical successor and critic, Averroes, seems to banish consciousness from the core of his cognitive psychology, in doing so he seems to anticipate contemporary efforts to expand the scope of consciousness through the notion of the ‘extended’ mind. This paper examines the varieties of consciousness recognized by Avicenna and several other classical Islamic thinkers with a view to understanding the extent to which their accounts can be mapped on to some of the concepts of consciousness delineated by contemporary philosophers of mind. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5801","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5801,"authors_free":[{"id":6722,"entry_id":5801,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah L. Black","free_first_name":"Deborah L.","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the mutakallim\u016bn","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought: Avicenna, Averroes, and the mutakallim\u016bn"},"abstract":"In classical Arabic philosophy, the topic of consciousness is commonly associated with Avicenna's \u2018Flying Man\u2019 thought experiment. But Avicenna's explorations of the nature of consciousness are not confined to the Flying Man, and he is by no means the only classical Islamic thinker to deem consciousness an important feature of our experience. Consciousness also plays a important role in the epistemology and moral psychology of Avicenna's intellectual rivals, the theologians (mutakallum\u016bn), who represent important sources for Avicenna's own theorizing about consciousness. And while Avicenna's philosophical successor and critic, Averroes, seems to banish consciousness from the core of his cognitive psychology, in doing so he seems to anticipate contemporary efforts to expand the scope of consciousness through the notion of the \u2018extended\u2019 mind. This paper examines the varieties of consciousness recognized by Avicenna and several other classical Islamic thinkers with a view to understanding the extent to which their accounts can be mapped on to some of the concepts of consciousness delineated by contemporary philosophers of mind.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09608788.2023.2201615","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5801,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"British journal for the history of philosophy","volume":"ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print)","issue":"","pages":"1-22"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: “En Orient, après Averroès … ” Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Intellectual history of the Islamicate world |
| Pages | 1-29 |
| Categories | Transmission, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a “frustrating” and “depressing” task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin’s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd’s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd’s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd’s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Lāhījī (d. 1072/1661–1662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5797","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5797,"authors_free":[{"id":6718,"entry_id":5797,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"},"abstract":"Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a \u201cfrustrating\u201d and \u201cdepressing\u201d task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin\u2019s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd\u2019s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd\u2019s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by \u02bfAbd al-Razz\u0101q al-L\u0101h\u012bj\u012b (d. 1072\/1661\u20131662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/2212943x-12340014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5797,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","volume":"","issue":"","pages":"1-29"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Averroès: La cohérence de la vérité |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France) |
| Volume | Les Essentiels (HS15) |
| Pages | 19-21 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5799","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5799,"authors_free":[{"id":6720,"entry_id":5799,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.3917\/sh.hs15.0019","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5799,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France)","volume":"Les Essentiels (HS15)","issue":"","pages":"19-21"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Noética y educación en Averroes. Un acercamiento a partir del Gran Comentario al De Anima de Aristóteles |
| Translation | Noetics and Education in Averroes.An Approach from the Comentarium Magnumin Aristotelis De Anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Open Insight |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 32 |
| Pages | 99-126 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima |
| Author(s) | Sandro Paredes |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The noetics developed by Averroes in his Comentarium Magnumin Aristotelis De Animacontains some references and arguments related to education. Our article high-lights Averroes’ use of the teacher-student relationship as an argument within the analysis of the intellect and the possible implications for a philosophy of educa-tion. To achieve this: i) we expose, as background, the problem about the one and multiple intellect in Alexander of Af-rodisia and Thesmistius; ii) we analyze the reception of this problem in some passag-es of the Comentarium Magnum of Averroes that refer to education and the use they have within the noetic argumentation of it; iii) some relevant considerations are proposed that allow reconstructing of Averroes’s philosophy of education. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5798","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5798,"authors_free":[{"id":6719,"entry_id":5798,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sandro Paredes","free_first_name":"Sandro ","free_last_name":"Paredes","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"No\u00e9tica y educaci\u00f3n en Averroes. Un acercamiento a partir del Gran Comentario al De Anima de Arist\u00f3teles","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Noetics and Education in Averroes.An Approach from the Comentarium Magnumin Aristotelis De Anima","main_title":{"title":"No\u00e9tica y educaci\u00f3n en Averroes. Un acercamiento a partir del Gran Comentario al De Anima de Arist\u00f3teles"},"abstract":"The noetics developed by Averroes in his Comentarium Magnumin Aristotelis De Animacontains some references and arguments related to education. Our article high-lights Averroes\u2019 use of the teacher-student relationship as an argument within the analysis of the intellect and the possible implications for a philosophy of educa-tion. To achieve this: i) we expose, as background, the problem about the one and multiple intellect in Alexander of Af-rodisia and Thesmistius; ii) we analyze the reception of this problem in some passag-es of the Comentarium Magnum of Averroes that refer to education and the use they have within the noetic argumentation of it; iii) some relevant considerations are proposed that allow reconstructing of Averroes\u2019s philosophy of education.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23924\/oi.v14i32.606","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5798,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Open Insight","volume":"14","issue":"32","pages":"99-126"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 51-58 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De anima, Intellect, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Elka Anakotta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5796","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5796,"authors_free":[{"id":6717,"entry_id":5796,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elka Anakotta","free_first_name":"Elka","free_last_name":"Anakotta","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"},"abstract":"Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.32996\/ijcrs.2023.3.2.7","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5796,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"51-58"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Averroès: La cohérence de la vérité |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France) |
| Volume | Les Essentiels (HS15) |
| Pages | 19-21 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5799","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5799,"authors_free":[{"id":6720,"entry_id":5799,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.3917\/sh.hs15.0019","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5799,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France)","volume":"Les Essentiels (HS15)","issue":"","pages":"19-21"}},"sort":[" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: “En Orient, après Averroès … ” Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Intellectual history of the Islamicate world |
| Pages | 1-29 |
| Categories | Transmission, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a “frustrating” and “depressing” task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin’s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd’s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd’s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd’s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Lāhījī (d. 1072/1661–1662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5797","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5797,"authors_free":[{"id":6718,"entry_id":5797,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"},"abstract":"Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a \u201cfrustrating\u201d and \u201cdepressing\u201d task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin\u2019s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd\u2019s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd\u2019s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by \u02bfAbd al-Razz\u0101q al-L\u0101h\u012bj\u012b (d. 1072\/1661\u20131662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/2212943x-12340014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5797,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","volume":"","issue":"","pages":"1-29"}},"sort":[" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd al-Ḥafīd (Averroes) y su exilio a Lucena: orígenes judíos, genealogía y conversión forzosa |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Al-Qantara |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 131–152 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Maribel Fierro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5149","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5149,"authors_free":[{"id":5928,"entry_id":5149,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":766,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Maribel Fierro","free_first_name":"Maribel","free_last_name":"Fierro","norm_person":{"id":766,"first_name":"Maribel","last_name":"Fierro","full_name":"Maribel Fierro","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054572747","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59118692","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1054572747.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Maribel Fierro"}}],"entry_title":" Ibn Ru\u0161d al-\u1e24af\u012bd (Averroes) y su exilio a Lucena: or\u00edgenes jud\u00edos, genealog\u00eda y conversi\u00f3n forzosa","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Ibn Ru\u0161d al-\u1e24af\u012bd (Averroes) y su exilio a Lucena: or\u00edgenes jud\u00edos, genealog\u00eda y conversi\u00f3n forzosa"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2017.005 ","ti_url":"","categories":[],"authors":[{"id":766,"full_name":"Maribel Fierro","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5149,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"38","issue":"2","pages":"131\u2013152 "}},"sort":[" Ibn Ru\u0161d al-\u1e24af\u012bd (Averroes) y su exilio a Lucena: or\u00edgenes jud\u00edos, genealog\u00eda y conversi\u00f3n forzosa"]}
| Title | The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes’ Saying Essence to God Abstract |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Turkish Academic Research Review - Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi [TARR] |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Categories | Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Fevzi Yiğit |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes’ saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers’ conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of “mawjūd” as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes’ calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbalī attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maqāl and al-Kashf an manāhij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sudūr (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- “absolute absence cannot be the source of existence”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5809","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5809,"authors_free":[{"id":6730,"entry_id":5809,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fevzi Yi\u011fit","free_first_name":"Fevzi ","free_last_name":"Yi\u011fit","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":" The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes\u2019 Saying Essence to God Abstract","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes\u2019 Saying Essence to God Abstract"},"abstract":"This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers\u2019 conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being\/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of \u201cmawj\u016bd\u201d as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes\u2019 calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbal\u012b attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maq\u0101l and al-Kashf an man\u0101hij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sud\u016br (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- \u201cabsolute absence cannot be the source of existence\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"10.30622\/tarr.982738","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5809,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Turkish Academic Research Review - T\u00fcrk Akademik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar Dergisi [TARR]","volume":"6","issue":"3","pages":""}},"sort":[" The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes\u2019 Saying Essence to God Abstract"]}
| Title | "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages | 69–96 |
| Categories | Psychology, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":["\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "]}
| Title | "If God will grant me life". Averroes the philosopher. Studies on the history of his development |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2004 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 15 |
| Pages | 227–254 |
| Categories | Biography |
| Author(s) | Gerhard Endress |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"399","_score":null,"_source":{"id":399,"authors_free":[{"id":541,"entry_id":399,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":203,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gerhard Endress","free_first_name":"Gerhard","free_last_name":"Endress","norm_person":{"id":203,"first_name":"Gerhard","last_name":"Endress","full_name":"Gerhard Endress","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115696954","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/82748395","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd115696954.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gerhard Endress"}}],"entry_title":"\"If God will grant me life\". Averroes the philosopher. Studies on the history of his development","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"If God will grant me life\". Averroes the philosopher. Studies on the history of his development"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2004","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"}],"authors":[{"id":203,"full_name":"Gerhard Endress","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":399,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"15","issue":null,"pages":"227\u2013254"}},"sort":["\"If God will grant me life\". Averroes the philosopher. Studies on the history of his development"]}
| Title | (Re)traduction et restitution du texte d’Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d’origine: Commentaire de la République de Platon |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Noesis |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 163–186 |
| Categories | Politics, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Abdennour Benantar |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyses the problematics of retranslation and restitution of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary of Plato’s Republic, in its original language, Arabic. Being at the confluents of politics and philosophy, this book is a real political treatise. The manuscript, probably lost during the time of Ibn Rushd’s disgrace, has reached us through its Hebrew translation by Samuel Ben Juda. Ahmed Chahlane and Mohamed A. al-Jabri have tried hard to return the manuscript from Hebrew into its original language. After determining the context in which Ibn Rushd’s book was written and its consequences for the author, the article analyses the problematics of (re)translation in the absence of the original (manuscript) and particularly the task of restitution conducted by Chahlane and al-Jabri. The focus is on their methodology of restitution and on the annotations made by Chahlane to the Hebrew and English translations from Hebrew by Rosenthal and Lerner, in which mistakes and approximations are numerous. The article shows how Chahlane and al-Jabri have considered the text in its original perspective and given back its frame using the work of Ibn Rushd himself and the Arab-Islamic philosophical corpus. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5216","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5216,"authors_free":[{"id":6018,"entry_id":5216,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdennour Benantar","free_first_name":"Abdennour","free_last_name":"Benantar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon"},"abstract":"The article analyses the problematics of retranslation and restitution of Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary of Plato\u2019s Republic, in its original language, Arabic. Being at the confluents of politics and philosophy, this book is a real political treatise. The manuscript, probably lost during the time of Ibn Rushd\u2019s disgrace, has reached us through its Hebrew translation by Samuel Ben Juda. Ahmed Chahlane and Mohamed A. al-Jabri have tried hard to return the manuscript from Hebrew into its original language. After determining the context in which Ibn Rushd\u2019s book was written and its consequences for the author, the article analyses the problematics of (re)translation in the absence of the original (manuscript) and particularly the task of restitution conducted by Chahlane and al-Jabri. The focus is on their methodology of restitution and on the annotations made by Chahlane to the Hebrew and English translations from Hebrew by Rosenthal and Lerner, in which mistakes and approximations are numerous. The article shows how Chahlane and al-Jabri have considered the text in its original perspective and given back its frame using the work of Ibn Rushd himself and the Arab-Islamic philosophical corpus.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5216,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noesis","volume":"21 ","issue":"","pages":"163\u2013186"}},"sort":["(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon"]}
| Title | ?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–63 |
| Categories | Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Mariano Pérez Carrasco |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| ¿Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? ¿Qué es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemológico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filosóficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tomás de Aquino no sólo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filosófica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos capítulos centrales. Uno de esos capítulos es el así llamado ‘‘averroísmo latino’’, fuertemente criticado por Tomás en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este artículo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tomás no sólo procura refutar la epistemología de Averroes, sino que, además, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como características del ‘‘averroísmo’’. Más específicamente, el artículo llama la atención acerca del modo en que Tomás (mal)interpreta la teoría de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en términos de su propia teoría de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":["?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"]}
| Title | A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 39-41 |
| Categories | Psychology, De anima |
| Author(s) | Davoud Zandi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect is an important issue in the realm of epistemology in Islamic philosophy. The aim of the present study is to compare the views of Averroes and Al-Farabi in this regard. Reviewing their theories, this study shows that both the mentioned philosophers agree upon the fact that the Active Intellect exists apart from human soul and acts as a creator of forms, but as for the relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect, there is disagreement between Averroes and Al-Farabi. Averroes believes that in some aspects both of them are the same yet they are different in some other aspects, namely regarding their acts they are different because the active intellect acts as creator of forms while the material intellect is just receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material intellect achieves perfection through the active intellect, whereas in Al-Farabi’s opinion, ontologically speaking; the material intellect and the active intellect are different in their existence. The material intellect in al-Farabi’s perspective is one of the stages of human intellect that is inherent in human soul, whereas the active intellect is an immaterial substance that exists apart from human soul. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5259","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5259,"authors_free":[{"id":6068,"entry_id":5259,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Davoud Zandi","free_first_name":"Davoud","free_last_name":"Zandi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi"},"abstract":"The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect is an important issue in the realm of epistemology in Islamic philosophy. The aim of the present study is to compare the views of Averroes and Al-Farabi in this regard. Reviewing their theories, this study shows that both the mentioned philosophers agree upon the fact that the Active Intellect exists apart from human soul and acts as a creator of forms, but as for the relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect, there is disagreement between Averroes and Al-Farabi. Averroes believes that in some aspects both of them are the same yet they are different in some other aspects, namely regarding their acts they are different because the active intellect acts as creator of forms while the material intellect is just receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material intellect achieves perfection through the active intellect, whereas in Al-Farabi\u2019s opinion, ontologically speaking; the material intellect and the active intellect are different in their existence. The material intellect in al-Farabi\u2019s perspective is one of the stages of human intellect that is inherent in human soul, whereas the active intellect is an immaterial substance that exists apart from human soul.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.15640\/jisc.v3n2a5 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5259,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"39-41"}},"sort":["A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi"]}
| Title | A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Persian |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 69-84 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Averroism, Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Ali Ghorbani , Fath ali Akbari |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Faṣl al-maqāl, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":["A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"]}